mathijs
Joined 15 years ago
Joined 15 years ago
Example: put the agent in Ask mode (so it can't edit files) and you'll see it try to edit files anyway. The train of thought shows "something went wrong editing the file, let me try a different way" and it'll start spewing out bash files or Python scripts that try to edit a file. None of it works or can be executed, but still.
Cheaper models often ignore the available function calls to find and edit files in the IDE, and will start asking for permission to execute grep and sed commands, as well as trying to echo entire bash or Python scripts to file again.
It is not exactly like an agent autonomously trying to hack Huggingface, but it is a way of frantically looking for a solution because 'giving up' is not what LLMs are trained for.
I've been finding myself increasingly annoyed by non-coding managers thinking AI is going to bring 190% reduction of cost, or will replace entire divisions of coders. It's a helpful tool, sometimes, but sometimes also a complete and utter tool. So I wrote this rant about it.
All thoughts, meeting notes, journals, blog post drafts... everything is jotted down in ST first. I even went as far as writing my own to-do list syntax highlighter[1] which is the main reason ST is always open, at home and at work, even though I mostly use VSCode and IntelliJ for coding nowadays.
Especially being from Europe: it is never clear if 10/04/23 means October 4th or April 11th unless you know which date format is being used.
Not sure if HN allows to plug your own apps, so please forgive: I made an app a while ago that aims to replace Google Authenticator for some of the reasons mentioned: it allows to back-up and transfer tokens without creating a large attack factor. Not having sync is a feature in this case as well. In fact, the app does not even have the internet permission enabled, so it utterly unable to phone home. Transferring backups does require a biometric lock.
It is also entirely free, so I'm only posting this out of pride of my own work: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pixplicity...
An even smarter way (in my opinion) of getting 5 star reviews is by showing the dialog only after x hours of use. Users most likely to rate badly will have the app uninstalled before the dialog shows.
However, in my experience, both Xamarin Studio and the build system are buggy as hell. Random or inexplicable build errors, things that break during updates, incompatibilities with official Android support libraries... I find myself doing 'clean project and rebuild' to fix random errors, or switching between alpha, beta and 'stable' channels all the time depending on which one does not have the bugs that I'm running in to.
Xamarin.Forms is simply a disaster. Because it aims to unify the apis for the UIs for various platforms it boils down to only the most common denominator of those platforms. And then makes it worse. Not only is it buggy, it is also very slow and incredibly limited. In our office we're keeping a list of all of Xamarin's silliness we encounter, here is just one of those:
"Clicking a Button changes its text alignment from center to left-aligned; it requires writing a custom Renderer to solve this."
I admit that Microsoft is usually quick to fix those bugs, but it doesn't instill much trust in the system if you're constantly running into issues. Many days I am literally working 50% of the time on my app and 50% working/fighting my way around Xamarins issues.I'd love to hear from someone using Visual Studio if their experience is more positive, but my advise is: please stay away from Xamarin.Forms and Xamarin Studio as much as possible.
Just an FYI: in the blog post you mention that the login for the preview of v2 is wallabag/wallabag, however I get 'bad credentials' when trying that.
This new Material Design version looks awesome! Eagerly looking forward to v2 becoming stable so I can upgrade.