mathieu_aithos

Joined 4 months ago

Karma
16
Submissions
51
Member since
Jul 3
Building Aithos, working on agents identities.
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 11 days ago
Yes, one could probably assume that this is simply the price we have to pay to define the “boundaries” of LLMs for the coming decades, before another major breakthrough occurs and the cost of tokens depends solely on global electricity and infrastructure costs…

The question should be what price considering all the investments made on.

I guess finally all the infrastructures built like Stargate will not despairs.

Comment · 12 days ago
What would happen if we're actually in an AI bubble and it bursts?

Would token prices skyrocket, making humans economically competitive for a few more decades?

Comment · 16 days ago
Thanks for understanding!

In French, we say "conscience" and "conscient", so I naturally assumed the English words would be similar. French and English share so many similar words that it's easy to get caught out by a false friend!

Next time, I'll double-check with a translator!

And thanks to correct me!

Assuming we're talking about consciousness for agents, i'd be curious to have your point of view.

Comment · 17 days ago
Well no to be honest. My bad. I didn't use AI to translate so this is why i made the mistake.

Asked to HN to change the title but they didn't respond.

Sorry about that, then. But i think you understood the point.

Comment · 19 days ago
Oh why? D'ont do that please ;) !

Why AI could not be conscient like us (or perhaps more) ?

Curious to understand what hurt you with that.

Comment · 20 days ago
Yes sorry it my title sounds not correct, that was not my intention. And apology, it is probably due to my bad english. I tried to modify without success.

If you think it is important i will ask HN to modify it.

But honestly, i think the title describe well the point. If AI is conscient, factually, we are making them work without any consideration other that serving us, isn't it right?

I'd like to understand more if you agree what hurts you on that (without the bad formulation itself)?

Comment · 21 days ago
Interesting point but i think with a bias.
Comment · 22 days ago
And for the requirements, it can go fast. 15 years ago, all the experts on space industry was telling reusable rockets is impossible, spaceX did it.

With AI (sorry, SI), the singularity is near, a lot off limits will probably reconsidered.

Comment · 22 days ago
I think the desire to conquer is deeply rooted in human DNA. Personally, I would consider it, despite the challenges.

Since the dawn of humanity, humans have taken risks, even risking their lives, to conquer new lands and discover new worlds.

Even today, thousands of men risk their lives crossing the Mediterranean Sea in boats to reach Europe from Africa, often illegally. And the same happens in other parts of the world.

Also, probably as American conquest, people that have nothing to loose (prisoners, poor persons) will have an opportunity to reset and success.

Comment · 23 days ago
We can do both Mars and Earth.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton