Recent submissions

Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
We're not actually and assuming that is the case is why we're in the mess we're in right now facing an existential risk from global warming and potential ecological collapse.
Comment · 5 years ago
Yes, that's the usual assumption when working with Turing machines and proofs. But I guess you could also allow infinite inputs and it wouldn't make that much difference, e.g. computing exp(x) for some real x as input.
Comment · 5 years ago
It's very fun. Thanks for putting it together.
Comment · 5 years ago
Yup, transposition error.
Comment · 5 years ago
Related: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/david-graeber-after-.... It's cool to see people waking up and getting organized.
Comment · 5 years ago
Just a heads up, worksheet 5 has an error: (P ↔ Q) → (R ↔ S) → (P ∧ Q ↔ R ∧ S). That proposition is not actually true.
Comment · 5 years ago
I mean by looking at the source code for the neural network someone can give an upper bound on how many steps will be required before the entire network halts and gives an answer and they can prove that their upper bound is really an upper bound.
Comment · 5 years ago
Ya, it could be more concise but I think that would require more prerequisites from the reader in terms of model theory and formal logic.
Comment · 5 years ago
At the rate things are going large parts of India will become uninhabitable: https://phys.org/news/2021-06-india-climate.html, https://www.dw.com/en/india-climate-change-ipcc/a-58822174. Similar things can be said for many other places that are currently near tipping points in terms of frequency and duration of heat waves and droughts.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton