matanyall

neat, gotta throw this into codex now :)

so much jev hype, honestly deserved

It's so funny, I've never done a cost-benefit analysis of having "good monitoring" and then still not being able to figure out what broke and needing to pull in someone who doesn't need the monitoring at all because they built the thing.

Can we just have something that replaced the page with test datasets and Disney IP to poison the training data? Or maybe just embed it into the page itself, but hidden?

git add passions.xml; git commit -m "feat: commitments"; git push

Lol, I love it

+1 for fastAPI

Gambling has a similar addiction profile to cigarettes and other drugs, so why not have the same kind of labels on every bet and app, something like, "FanDuel is legally required to tell you that sports gambling has been shown to cause massive financial losses and is a major cause of divorce."

I am also against specifically state sponsored gambling like the lottery. At least (non casino style day trading) investment in stocks has upside at all.

Why do people do things? Doing things is falsely valued.

(Am partially sentient collection of coral, YMMV)

Damn, y'all ok over there in Nixland?

This is a huge issue. What's the point of doing replication studies (which we need) if folks just don't care about the result.

It's heavy handed, but I think every time a study fails to reproduce its results, every single published paper that uses that refuted study is notified, the authors get 6 months with a warning banner on top of the article, and if a correction is not submitted, it's automatically removed.

Science isn't supposed to be easy. We need a system that prioritizes high quality output, not volume.

When you have a pile of hardware and silicon Intellectual Property, patents, etc, IMO it's pretty clever. However, I'm a Groq Engineer, and I'm mega-biased.