markkum

Joined 15 years ago

Karma
65
Submissions
51
Member since
Mar 17
Founder & CEO of Mepin / Meontrust Inc. Serial entrepreneur, serial father, cereal lover ... password hater.

www.mepin.com

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 12 years ago
Comment · 12 years ago
Funnily; the reason to outsource is exactly about not putting all your eggs in the same shared basket. You outsource the 2nd factor and keep the first factor (passwords) in-house. Implementing everything in-house is a "same shared basket".
Comment · 13 years ago
I can use similar arguments; a user can be tricked to enter an OTP to a phishing site. For that the hacker does not need to time the attack to the same second, so it's much much easier attack for the hacker.

'No 2FA' is the real silly one here. Any 2FA is so much better than no 2FA, and usability has been a big issue so far in 2FA adoption.

Comment · 13 years ago
Note that MePIN does not collect or need user's phone number, e-mail address or any other user information. You can use MePIN fully anonymously.
Comment · 13 years ago
Unfortunately there are several cases where users have entered an OTP code for another user. The recent high profile case was with World of Warcraft's OTP.
Comment · 13 years ago
Don't want to argue, but yes it would. It would stop the user for a second, giving time to the brain to process for a while what's going on.
Comment · 13 years ago
This is now fixed. Thanks for the kick.
Comment · 13 years ago
First; the user does not have to care about OS, browser, ip address or location. Though those can be shown to a user if the service provider wants.

Authorization requests can only be initiated at the back-end by authorized service providers and only for users who have linked their MePIN app with that specific provider. Though of course login verification could be initiated with stolen username/password, which would then alert the user for verification.

Now the added benefit here is that with MePIN the user would immediately know that her username and password is at wrong hands if she receives a login verification request while not actually performing a login.

So obviously the user should not authorize unexpected requests. You would not authorize a login if you are not actually performing a login, etc. Concerned users can additionally set up a personal PIN code in the app.

Lack of good usability is currently hampering 2FA adoption, we are working hard to fix that.

Comment · 13 years ago
Of course user behavior has to be considered. The MePIN app does allow the user to set up a personal PIN code, so an authorization would then require the PIN code and a tap.
Comment · 13 years ago
Comment · 13 years ago
Working on it.
Comment · 13 years ago
The service is distributed and hosted at 3 continents with 3 different hosting providers, so we take this seriously.

Other than that; You own your users and user database. No user data is stored at MePIN servers.

Comment · 13 years ago
It's easier because you only need to tap the app to verify. No need for OTP codes, though OTP is a fallback if your device is offline.
Comment · 13 years ago
This is the London I remember from early morning July 8th, 2005, the morning after the bombings. Was walking around to find a ride to the airport, couple of blocks from the double-decker wreck. Wish not to experience the same again.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton