magicmu

I don't think it does, since you can't sell individual Hearthstone cards for money or trade them between accounts. It's still an ethically questionable business model imo, but it's in a somewhat different category than loot boxes (or physical trading cards).

I've generally felt the same way, but it seems that in the last couple of years the line has become blurred. For example, if I have a smartphone that is always connected to the internet via 4G, and I speak within range of the microphone, does that count as doing something "on the Internet"? Then devices like Alexa or Google Home enter the picture. As more of our lives become connected, the line between what is and is not online becomes much more difficult to discern.

I had no idea about the details of Tricare, that's pretty interesting. I suppose it makes sense for a government to be very invested in the healthcare of its armed forces.I was thinking more about the United States army's particular global role as the primary means of the violent perpetuation of capitalism and Western hegemony. You make a great point; I think the main difference in our perspectives could be approaching the question domestically versus globally.

That's an interesting definition of socialism; I didn't intend it in that way. Open source seems "socialist" to me by virtue of the pretty much the same attributes that you're (I think correctly) describing as anarchic. It's a broad term, I think we're saying the same thing :)

On one hand it's always cool to see increased adoption of open source, but it strikes me as more than a little subversive for the DoD to adopt an open source methodology. I can't help but see the appropriation of an inherently equitable and socialist means of sharing innovation (FOSS) by a violent, exclusionary, and globally oppressive regime to be a step in a very wrong direction.

This was my thought as well, but for somewhat different reasons. I think Musk does fit this modern definition of libertarian -- a lack of faith in government progress is a necessary logical foundation for attempting to pioneer space travel privately. I definitely agree, though, that many YC guys don't seem to be libertarian at all. It's also definitely worth noting that this modern definition of "libertarian" is so divorced from it's original anti-capitalist meaning that it's almost a different word. Leary's vision was "libertarian" in the sense that it was wholly at odds with capitalism as it currently exists, and put the onus of human progress on people instead of government. It was not "libertarian" in the sense of advocating for exploitative private companies like those we see in the Valley.

Exposing personal information like that, while maybe not illegal (I don't have the qualifications to say), is something I definitely see as unethical; at least if an opt-out option isn't even provided. Beyond the personal info like email, full name, and profile picture (all of which is definitely easily scrapable and not a _huge_ deal to me), I noticed that it had made the type, modulus, and exponent of each of my RSA keys available. I know that these can be derived from an RSAPublicKey, but I'm not sure what making them easily viewable means (if anything). Could someone with more encryption knowledge shed some light on that?

Awesome write-up!! I had never heard of linear calculus before, is that an extension of linear algebra or a distinct field?

It looks like this site got hugged to death, does anyone have a mirror link?

Looks awesome! I've been using 1password, are there any big advantages that KeePass has over it?