m0rde

I'm a bit confused. You posted fake stats online and saw ChatGPT visit the page. So you immediately assume that ChatGPT is falling for those fake stats and using it in chat responses or analysis input? Where's the proof for that? How do you know ChatGPT didn't search, find and discard the fake stats?

You also saw your fake stats in a paper and a few other sites and assumed ChatGPT put it there? Not a human visiting your site and grabbing those fake stats?

Did I miss the evidence that shows ChatGPT is actually using the fake stats? Serious question.

P.S.: Posted this as a top level comment then saw your post.

I'm a bit confused. Someone posted fake stats online and saw ChatGPT visit their page. Then they immediately assume that ChatGPT is falling for those fake stats and using it in chat responses or analysis input? Where's the proof? How do you know it didn't search, find, and discard?

The author also sees their stats in a paper and a few other sites and assumes ChatGPT put it there? Not a human visiting the fake stats site?

Did I miss the evidence that shows ChatGPT is actually using the fake stats? Serious question.

You're rude

Thanks, great ideas to try out here!

Enterprise pay as you go across a few vendors. But still cost conscious.

Defaulting to Sol Medium/Light for most planning and implementation I think is tricky or want more care in.

Luna Extra High for everything else (implementation, tedious take over my browser and do stuff).

I read all of its output tokens and lots of thinking tokens to understand the general flow of things, but only minimally look at code these days. I can't grok what Claude models speak and it's gotten worse. OAI models speak my kind of tech language I guess.

Light human review, some automated review.

Most work is for internal use.

> Fable 5: Reasoned so long it exhausted the output budget before finishing the drawing.

Lol

> * Grok 4.5 has an advantage on CursorBench: an earlier snapshot of the Cursor codebase was unintentionally included in training. The exact score impact is unclear. That data has been removed for future models. For a rundown of third-party benchmark scores, see the Grok 4.5 launch blog.

I don't know about those numbers, even assuming this was by mistake :)

Mighty Squirrel is at Gore place for the summer...

Okay, maybe that's beer and closer to Waltham =P

Yeah. I get that many HN comments are just complaints (heck mine was too and just as negative and shaming). But how bad of a day must you be having to try to shame someone about how they choose to write up an experience they thought was neat. Whatever, free speech and all that. Hope OC's day gets better.

What a difficult world you must live in these days