lnkl

>This article would be 100% correct if it came out 1 year ago, 75% correct 9 months ago, 50% correct 3 months ago and it's probably 25% correct now if not less.

Feels like I read comment similar to this one each year since 2023.

The point is, you will be better than your competitor if you resist it.

No way that he would lie about this, right?

I don't understand this, didn't they feel like crap all the time with such diet?

Seems like this link is for you.

"Let me share my slightly unusual definition of “effort”: it’s the felt experience of expending energy beyond what an activity requires, like tensing your brow when you try to understand something, or the excess tension in your hand when you hold your phone...Using this definition, it’s clear that the appropriate amount of effort for any activity is zero."

Were they also open source?

>Article praising LLMs.

>Look inside.

>Written by someone having a stake in LLM business.

Every time.

Nothing, really

How is this a header-only? It contains non-static, non-inline functions in the .h file...

C3 has operator overloading.