littlewing
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&c...
"At his Colorado Springs laboratory during 1899–1900, by using voltages of the order of 10 megavolts generated by an enormous coil, he was able to light three incandescent lamps at a distance of about one hundred feet."
The modern pronunciation we're familiar with kills much of the rhyme and meaning.
A quote from that: "Those who read about the aliens in an easy-to-read font (16-point Arial pure black) answered correctly 72.8 percent of the time, compared to 86.5 percent of those who reviewed the material in hard-to-read fonts (12-point Comic Sans MS or Bondoni MT in a lighter shade)."
The reality is that businesses:
(1) aren't sure of the value of their data. Perhaps there is a company willing to buy their data and they might need that money someday. Maybe if they had more historic data, reporting would show a clearer trend in some way that would help drive them in the right direction- if they had the resources to analyze all of it.
(2) may not fully understand the laws and regulations they may be bound to that relate to how long they need to keep data.
I think it's not a bad thing to spend the time to understand your legal obligations, clean up your data, and remove what you'd never need or never realistically be able to sell. But many companies don't have that time.
That's scary. What do you think he means by that, specifically? It seems like a threat to me.
For the size and intensity of effort going on at Twitter, I respectfully disagree.
Once the team gets large enough, NMP ("Not My Problem" mindset) comes into play, and unless you have the culture from the beginning to always be making the development process better, and acquisitions and new management has never changed that, which is highly unlikely, then having a dedicated person or team to help make other developers jobs easier is a great idea- after the team gets to a certain size. What that size is depends on what is being done, though.
That seems to be a stretch you might say, but, similarly, Genesis tells a story of the creation of life which isn't wholly incompatible with our scientific understanding. There were stars, planets, life originating in plants while the earth was covered with clouds, finally the stars, sun and moon appeared through the clouds, then animals in the sea evolved, then birds/dinosaurs, then mammals, and finally a mammal called a human.
Even the rib of Adam could be a simple way of telling about the X chromosome, doubled to make the female (double X chromosomes).
Sure, you could say people made up these Bible stories if you want. However, in my mind it closely aligns with current knowledge of science and evolution that it would seem to indicate that humans in the past had some way of knowing past history they'd never experienced.
Perhaps something, likely an intelligent entity, spread life to Mars as a seed, it thrived, but then Mars became an inhospitable place so it was moved to Earth. Then later it came back to tell the story to a human or perhaps even all humans, and that story was relayed from generation to generation.