lev272

I noticed the bike thing when traveling to NYC recently. I assumed it had something to do with the city's utilization bill not applying to bikes.

I sympathize with the people in this story, but I wonder where the line should be drawn when it comes to regulating the sale of homemade goods for consumption. There has to be some protection for the consumer—just hopefully not like this.

We use Cortex and I'd say I'm pleased with it. It doesn't offer the end-to-end solution that something like SageMaker does, but it's the best tool we've used for deploying models. Also, and this is less of a technical feature and more of a nice to have, but the team has been really responsive when we've had problems and they seem to be shipping new features at a steady clip.

Most telling part of their statement is the defense that the company operates "like like any other agency of its kind"—as if that is a defense.

As disgusting as this is, there are so many layers to regulating, much of which stems from the nature of social media platforms vs. traditional media platforms. Are the platforms they're posting on subject to the same propaganda regulations as news outlets? Are they as individuals liable for the spread of misinformation, as a result?

Who are the most highly regarded of the firms in Infosys's field?

I realize that might sound sarcastic, but I mean it sincerely. I have little experience with that world, but I wasn't aware there was a hierarchy of brands in the offshore consulting firm space. Now I'm curious