lauradhamilton
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
Regarding your point on Bayes Theorem, that's valid in some ways and invalid in some ways. Suppose someone gets a vitamin D test back at 8 ng/mL. There's not really a chance of a false positive. He's deficient and needs supplementation. Making the test cheaper, faster, and more accessible can really only improve the health of the population. It will likely also drive down the cost of healthcare overall, because vitamin D deficiency has all sorts of unpleasant effects.
Furthermore, the literature suggests that the vast majority of doctors do not understand Bayes Theorem. Source: http://yudkowsky.net/rational/bayes
That means applying less skepticism towards "alternative" therapies.
Then you also have the following working against science: - Confirmation bias - Mistaking coincidence with causation - Overly aggressive pattern matching
You can also upsell consulting services (again, depending on the niche).
Link: http://opencityapps.org/
One thing you could do is look through their apps (they're all open source & on github) and figure out which ones might make sense for your city.
You can then clone the apps you like, configure them for your city (many cities use the Socrata data platform, so this may be simply a config change in some cases) and deploy it for your city.