larkeith
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
Perhaps not as an individual, but I wonder about as a society - I don't know how we would get to this point, but imagine the sheer potential we as a culture could unlock by moving to a more cooperative model; consider the billions upon billions of person-hours wasted on things like stock trading, internal politicking, and marketing/advertising: all the things that provide no value to the race, but "required" to facilitate interpersonal competition.
Of course, none of that is against your primary point, which is that hard work is still, on the whole, required. It just irritates me to see competition equated to a law of nature; we're not animals, we can choose whether and how competition applies.
Seeing that people believe this was quite unexpected, at first - it's such an obvious phenomenon looking down into any slightly deep body of water. But on reflection, it makes sense: many (most?) people in the world might live most or all of their lives without going beyond the shorelines of a sea, ocean, or larger lake/river.
It's a good reminder to always be critical of the assumptions you make, and how much they depend on your own context.
(If you ever get the opportunity, visit Crater Lake. The drop from blue to midnight to pitch is beautiful.)
It only took 2-3 hours for Apple to assess the PR cost of banning the app and decide it's not worth the income increase.
Though `dateutil` is still recommended for most cases.
Admittedly, there are alternatives to manned colonialization (e.g. seeding), but it seems rather worth exploring multiple options, considering the stakes.