lajr
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
Honestly I like the C# better, and I was initially not super thrilled about the choice to include the period in the TS case, but since there is some overlap between the language design teams I assumed they would be the same.
My initial thought was how hacky the whole thing feels, but then the fact that it works and gives rise to complex behaviour (like coercing specific tool selection in the Manus post) is quite simple and elegant.
Also as an aside, it is good that it appears that each standard tag is a single token in the OpenAI repo.
[1] https://manus.im/blog/Context-Engineering-for-AI-Agents-Less... [2] https://github.com/NousResearch/Hermes-Function-Calling
A great book that touches on this distinction is Fully Automated Luxury Communism (https://www.versobooks.com/books/3156-fully-automated-luxury...). Basically it argues that it is more beneficial and less expensive to provide UBS.
1. Add hotkeys for each tool
2. Make delete actually delete things rather than going "back" in the browser
3. Make escape return the user to the "move" tool
4. When you use the "add" tool and add something, the menu closes but the tool stays selected at which point clicking it again deselects it rather than reopening the menu
5. Don't export the "cursor" square when you export the diagram. Perhaps also an export to image rather than svg would be valuable for the kinds of purposes people would use this tool for
At the moment the tool looks great and gets the job done, but I find myself hitting a wall in terms of what I can do with it (mainly around those points I've mentioned).
There is a section near the start where there are 4 options: Large accelerated filer, Non-accelerated filer, Accelerated filer, or Smaller reporting company.
In this option, "Large accelerated filer" is checked on the PDF, but "Non-accelerated filer" is checked on the Markdown.