kstenson
Joined 18 years ago
Joined 18 years ago
The problem is it doesn't go any deeper than the surface, about the underlying advantage that some parts of society have that others don't. It simplifies the discussion into an almost child like argument about who gets the sweets and assumes that it's a zero sum game.
I am a strong believer in meritocracy, but I also am aware of the actually reality of society means that it doesn't perfectly exist. I feel that if people feel strongly about meritocracy they should be open to increasing the funnel of people that can participate.
As other have said this problem doesn't seem to be self correcting in the tech industry, and if promoting someone just because they are female is something people try I don't really have a problem with it. I have seen many people in my career in this industry promoted for worse reasons.
The fact that you were able to start your own company and succeed is a mixture of your upbringing, your standing in society as much as your intelligence and access to capital.
It's a common fallacy to think that just working harder or having the grit to strike out is the only factor. I would suggest that line of thinking would lead to some form of survivorship bias.
it's only 700 hkd for the week pass.
http://www.fluentin3months.com/home/
My wife who speaks a couple of languages says that to really ingrain it you must think in the language, don't think in english and then translate.
Hong Kong, is owned by a bunch of families, it's as far from a free market and is more like a capitalist aristocracy.