krackers
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1642028/what-is-the-oper...
That's an odd way of phrasing it, since the $1 is still worth $1, and a naive reading would make you think it's "worth more" when the buying power has actually reduced.
Wouldn't it be clearer to say $1 today only buys you 64% of what you could have bought in 2008.
https://www.anthropic.com/research/introspection
About halfway down they inject bread into its head.
I wonder how this squares with the recent "NNs are already clean" interpretability finding, which may have also been the impetus for this kind of research. Similar to their work on CNNs, maybe residual-steering is overkill, there might be just a single neuron that "cleanly" corresponds to "evilness" that you can turn up/down?
It was technically curl that dropped SecureTransport but I guess because no one at Apple was willing to maintain it and it apparently is a frozen API that doesn't support newer than TLS 1.2 (!). For a while their inbuilt curl could use both but preferred LibreSSL anyway.
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2025/01/14/secure-transport-supp...
And curl was patched to use the native TLS implementation (SecureTransport) which obviously used Keychain as well.
For some reason when they switched to LibreSSL everywhere they decided to ship their own copy? I don't know what they were thinking.
It answers one of the conceptual questions that came to mind as to why it's even a well-defined concept:
> When the Jacobian is studied in an LLM, it provides directions in the residual stream that are “verbalizable” (Gurnee et al., 2026), which is to say that it identifies how perturbations change the linguistic output of the model. However, this property holds only in the local neighborhood of the point on which the Jacobian is defined, and the J-lens is defined by averaging over prompts, tokens, and future positions in the output layer. An average Jacobian has no reason to behave like any of its elements.