kovezd

Lol so this means Netflix/streaming is the next trend going down?

What you are saying is not a hiring problem, but an education one.

If colleges stayed up to date, and teach valuable skills, the jump wouldn't be so steep!

You can now ask Gemini, about a video. Very useful!

That was not a person, it was an LLM.

By the composition of evals. Plus secondary metrics like parameter size, and token cost.

Not perfect, but useful.

Yes. We should only allow social media in a printed format.

Nothing to do with linear, meaningful projections on embedding spaces, and everything to do with efficient maintenance of legacy data reporting systems.

While the critique is valid, that does not offer a path to the solution.

Utilitarism is the ruling moral philosophy, and the only possible countermeasure is externalities but that depends on an effective government which is even more unlikely that asking for ethical behavior to corporations.

Just as the other comment "have to" is a very strong word. But there are benefits to it: a) adaptability to local weather patterns, b) no access to WiFi in large properties.

Need is a very strong word. We don't need a lot of we have today.

But as a hobbyist I would prefer to program in an LLM than learn a bunch of algorithms, and sensor readings. It's also very similar to how I would think about it, making it easier to debug.

There are places where: a) weather predictions are unreliable, b) there is scarcity of water. Just making the right decision on at what hour to water is a huge monthly saving of water.

Don't be so concerned. There's ample evidence that thinking is often disassociated from the output.

My take is that this is a user experience improvement, given how little people actually goes on to read the thinking process.

It's funny that even in a simple setting the AI couldn't avoid to hallucinate. As this clearly isn't a champions match.