konchunas
Joined 6 years ago
Karma
55
Submissions
12
Member since
May 25
Joined 6 years ago
People all over the comments accusing me of nitpicking. I can agree with that. But I also feel like this happens because of what you call "a thousand paper cuts". It works, but feels surprisingly unpleasant.
Allowing us to run Unix command line in Windows is a great achievement for Windows team, props to them. But it isn't yet comparable to the real deal like Linux or OSX. The speed, the looks, the integration. I'm actually surprised that (subjectively) Linux UI with all that fragmentation looks a bit more consistent than one of Windows.
I hope Microsoft addresses all these problems, but guessing from previous experience it make take a while.
Granted we are in the age of slop proofs and it is unfeasible to verify proof by hands, anyone can ask LLMs to create numerical tests of computable parts of a proof. And if it "blows-up" or behaves suspiciosly LLM will notice that.
This is a kind of software fuzzing, but for Lean proofs.
The problem is if you have no math cred (as is the case here, I presume), it's quite hard to get someone competent to read such disproval and verify its validity.