knight17
Joined 18 years ago
Joined 18 years ago
Having a native app means it is there—you can share things from other applications, and it is easy to see it as a distinct entity that can be opened by clicking on the icon in the app drawer (you can do this with web apps; it's just that now there are load times, you may need to re-login, etc.). Apps allow offline functionality, access to device sensors and features, etc in a more seamless way. I hope the progressive web apps are able to do these things in the future.
In addition to all this, if you are a sophisticated user with an eye for detail, even for native applications, you want the right kind of native app that uses the OS's own widgets, icons, and UI patterns. It is a tough place for new services to gain acceptance.
State of desktop search is very bad but this is what I use. It is of acceptable quality.
https://www.makeuseof.com/post-wordpress-using-microsoft-wor...
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/help-with-bloggin...
- it is easy to copy
- and navigate to that word's page
- and at the same time it will preserve the ability to click to select, too.
>> Put another way, many tools for thought are public goods. They often cost a lot to develop initially, but it’s easy for others to duplicate and improve on them, free riding on the initial investment. While such duplication and improvement is good for our society as a whole, it’s bad for the companies that make that initial investment. And so such tools for thought suffer the fate of many public goods: our society collectively underinvests in them, relative to the benefits they provide.
PwC fined over exam cheating involving 1,100 of its auditors
"The Element's rubber floors can be hosed down, ...."
https://books.google.ca/books?id=0BvVSP2ugU4C&lpg=PA47&dq=ho...