kla-s

I wonder how routinely wearing compression socks interacts with this proposed mechanism.

Always thought it interesting that for certain diagnosis wearing them until end of life is indicated according to current guidelines and we don’t expect maladoption (weakening of the connective tissue). Id kind of prefer/would be interested in a workout based approach, also interesting what knock on effects such workout would have on the larger system

Id also add that 5) We need some sense of truth.

Im not quite sure if the current paradigm of LLMs are robust enough given the recent Anthropic Paper about the effect of data quality or rather the lack thereof, that a small bad sample can poison the well and that this doesn’t get better with more data. Especially in conjunction with 4) some sense of truth becomes crucial in my eyes (Question in my eyes is how does this work? Something verifiable and understandable like lean would be great but how does this work with more fuzzy topics…).

Stiction

Do you care to explain more, id be interested :)

I guess bioelectricity. Michael Levin is the guy to look at afaik.

Thanks @missedthecue, i wasn't aware this was productized and tested (though hoped it was)

Any serious ideas for a recently removed glioblastom?

Whats your view on Cum-Ex?

And maybe as a Bonus what do you make of the smaller (relative) taxrate the bigger fish (companies/wealthier individuals) pay?

Wow that video is awesome, thanks for sharing

To add some nuance, unused/unnecessary sugar will cause diabetes. If you are in high cardiovascular load consuming more than you can take in as eg with long distance triathlon, to my knowledge you will not increase your diabetes risk. It's more a matching supply and demand thing.

Genuine question, how does multi step reasoning work for you then? Like eg if you have some math problem that's trivially to solve individually but needs multiple steps, lets say 16 * 3 + 5? How does 16 * 3 = 48 land in some 'register' of your brain (short term memory), so that you can then add 5 to get to 53? Maybe 16 * 3 + 5 is to easy for you and you'll just 'see' it but the question still stands, just choose a more complex problem.

Isn't the same meta process at play when thinking about more fuzzy topics?

Thank you, for making the effort of making this so accessible! Danke :)

Well then thats „Volksabstimmungen“ as Switzerland has it for you.