kelsier1

There has to be a snippet showcasing what to expect if we sign up.

"You will receive a concise, data-driven briefing covering the most critical global military developments and geopolitical shifts. Our goal is to provide situational awareness without the fluff, delivered straight to your inbox."

This is just an empty promise statement that is soliciting our email.

"Instructions on getting hit by a bus will soon be posted to our project Web site, so that the average developer will be able to gauge his or her importance to the Open Source community."

Oh God XD

This dude's love for terminal utils is mirroring mine and I'm here for it.

I liked the fuck out of this article. I read it fully and I liked it. I read it because I liked reading it. And I wrote this because I want the author to know I liked it. What a riot of actionable points written so simply! <insert of-course-simpson meme> Alright then. I'm off. To read . Anything I want.

I tried it out and it seems ...okay? I'm yet to identify all the pitfalls. But to the seasoned terminal (CMD/Terminal/Bash) user, who has his dotfiles and aliases etc configured (I use batch files on Windows :( ), I don't know how much of a difference this is going to make on a day-to-day basis. How are folks using it so far?

Their claim hasn't been that 4o is better than 4. Just that it's faster and cheaper. So it's better than 3.5-turbo but not as good as 4, atleast from the examples I've tried out for summarization, code gen etc.

I'm wondering what the usecase for this is. There are literally 5-6 git commands folks use. Ctrl+r does the job beautifully for most of my needs. And for free.

People have too much free time. Classic solutionism