kauffj
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
Logically, it's likely there must be trade-offs for higher IQs or it would have been selected for more strongly.
A blockchain is the only technology that allows a simultaneously decentralized and coherent view of what exists on a network along with local control over identity.
I think blockchain sucks in many ways and is a big hassle. We try to hide it as much as possible. It's still the right solution to this problem.
We're just rolling out our mainstream video product explicitly designed to compete with YouTube @ https://odysee.com
To learn more about the protocol itself, check out https://lbry.tech
There is no search all of PeerTube. There is search all of LBRY.
LBRY uses a public blockchain to allow creators to retain complete control over their publishing identity. It also has a beautiful consumer app experience at https://lbry.tv, which was used by about 4M people last month (P2P apps at lbry.com/get).
You can read more in our IEEE paper here: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9126007
Or dig into the specification and APIs at https://lbry.tech
This is trivially false, as people accept money for health risk every day (see: working in medicine, transportation, mining, leaving your house, etc.)
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2020/03/variolation-may-cut-co...
1. They had someone with a clear history of strong anti-Trump and anti-Republican sentiment take the action (https://twitter.com/LevineJonathan/status/126545757821512499...)
2. Twitter chose a prediction rather than a factual statement to fact check ("Mail-In Ballots will be..."). Why not start with a truly factually wrong statement about the past?
3. They picked something that is actually debatable! A bipartisan committee concluded it carried some risks in 2005: https://www.wsj.com/articles/heed-jimmy-carter-on-the-danger...
The notion that a company can ever be trusted to "fact check" (aka determine objective truth) is just completely laughable. The closest we can come is labeling agent beliefs about truth ("X says Y is false").
Doing nothing would be better than doing this. Even better would be building solutions that allow community-based (and ideally personalized) derivations of consensus (this is what we're doing at LBRY).
I live in NH as a member of the http://freestateproject.org/
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/kauffj; my proof: https://keybase.io/kauffj/sigs/HnABU5n3dQfJWWFm2HiryKMuXlnV4AC2AL39YsAg8Qo ]