kartayyar
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
"It is one thing to build a search engine, and an entirely different thing to convince regular users of the need to switch to a better choice."
This line in post doesn't seem intellectually honest about why I think Neeva failed: it was never a 10X better experience. e.g. ChatGPT isn't complaining about acquiring users.
I believe Google when they say competition is just one click away. A bunch of things I would have asked Google now go to ChatGPT.
- This understanding can be encapsulated in "compressed" low dimensional vector representation of a sequences.
- You can use this understanding for many different downstream tasks, especially predicting the next item in a sequence.
- This approach scales really well with lots of GPUs and data and is super applicable to generating text.
Replit's model seems to have focused on being cheap to train and run. StarCoder seems to be vastly better on quality.
Imo I want competition and choice as a consumer. This basically sets things up so that consoles become a non competitive market because Xbox lacks exclusives that Sony has.
No for ads.
Yes for training models for Smart Reply, from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.04870.pdf
Privacy Note that all email data (raw data, preprocessed data and training data) was encrypted. Engineers could only inspect aggregated statistics on anonymized sentences that occurred across many users and did not identify any user. Also, only frequent words are retained. As a result, verifying model’s quality and debugging is more complex.
And then the appeals process after that was just like yours: copy pasta email without any explanation about how to fix the problem.
In general, I would recoment OR Tools.
Solution: don't subscribe to that Subreddit.
That kind of makes me doubt this report, at the very least part of it.
https://github.com/Roblox/open-game-eval/blob/main/LLM_LEADE...