karp773

Oracle is up there in top 3 with ~$45B AI debt, right after Amazon and Allphabet. And they have little to show for it.

What's your opinion on Oracle's debt?

With Opus 5.5, humans are the bottleneck. Anything human: tasks, reviews, user testing, feedback, etc. Also, even such a great model as the latest Opus seems to not fully understand the human side of the software, its benefits to humans, why this software being built in the first place. But I am sure the latter is a matter of time.

Sports and entertainment come to mind.

> I think todays latest models would satisfy most users

This reminds me the famous (although unproven) "640K ought to be enough for anybody."

How did you use it? In agy cli?

People complain about the slop-release. Who knows, maybe it is the first self-release by an AI model in history.

They want the electorate to be scared and vote in incompetent, corrupt, compromised, anti-EU, and divisive government. And then divide et impera.

You have not been paying attention then. It's been posted on HN millions times already: Chineese models, Chinese vendors. /s

Try gitea. It's super lightweight and feels and looks very similar to gitlab. I did not benchmark but it feels like it needs 10% of ram and cpu of gitlab requirements. It's great.

It would not take them so long to train it. Their pace would be closer to the Chinese models.

He is right in a sense that a lot of abstract concepts, in e.g. combinatorics, can be explained even to middle school students if given as simple examples starting with trivial cases and showing the pattern. How many textbooks do that? Close to zero. How many research notebooks are full of these? I cannot say for sure but I suspect much greater than 0.

It's not even funny any more. Chinese model, Chinese vendor, Chinese, Chinese... Did I say Chinese? Chinese!

Nobody in his right mind will use a Chinese clone when you have models like Opus 5.5 for peanuts.