kanishkalinux
Joined 9 years ago
Karma
93
Submissions
30
Member since
Jan 31
Recent submissions
Comment · 1 year ago
Thanks. I've written about it in detailed in the README. But most important thing that differentiate it from other self-hosted variants is the ability to see references along with chat and ability to exclude/include specific sources from your local sources for targeted discussion. Moreover it has integrated note taking feature in markdown, so that all of your digital knowledge-base is at one place.
Comment · 1 year ago
Inquisitive - self-hosted knowledge-base with a touch of LLM/RAG.
Link: https://github.com/kanishka-linux/inquisitive
I've been working on this on and off since last couple of months to consolidate all of my digital knowledge-base like notes/links/pdf etc with the help of LLM/RAG. It is fully self-hosted with very minimal setup instructions - which should be easily installable by anyone on their local machine.
UI is very bare minimal. It still has some rough edges when it comes to the UI part, but usable. I've been regularly using it since sometime, and it works well (atleast for my use case) when it comes to searching and organizing personal knowledge-base.
Feel free to try it!
Comment · 8 years ago
By the way, this application is not just about archiving. For regular archiving wget (and in your case HTTrack), are more than sufficient. Reminiscence has been developed for bookmarking, archiving, organizing and access from anywhere.
Comment · 8 years ago
Pretty detailed suggestions! Thanks.
I'll keep them in mind when iterating on next version of the project.
Comment · 8 years ago
I think, wget is even better and much older than it.
Comment · 8 years ago
About videos, I'm thinking about providing some way to add custom user scripts, so that users can use their favorite download manager to download media elements from site.
About gif, they are will be included in the archived page. Everything with 'img' tag will be fetched for archiving.
Comment · 8 years ago
That was amazing feedback! Thanks a lot!
About user-interface, I agree it needs improvement. Especially inbuilt reader needs some work.
Can you suggest some improvements in UI?
Comment · 8 years ago
It looks quite innovative. I'll see if I can get some ideas from it.
Comment · 8 years ago
Thanks!
I'll add support for annotations in project's TODO list. It'll be a nice addition to any archiving solution.
Comment · 8 years ago
Thanks! I have not used shaarli and bookmark-archiver personally. But from their documentation it looks like shaarli doesn't archive in various formats and doesn't have auto-tagging feature. About bookmark-archiver, I think one can't add links into it directly via web-interface and doesn't organize links directory-wise apart from features like auto-tagging and summarization. I'll look into alternative bookmark managers, and will try to provide some comparison chart in README.
Comment · 8 years ago
Thanks. I didn't know about webrecorder. It also looks cool. I'll look into it.
Comment · 8 years ago
It doesn't integrate web-server in default installation. In docker installation, one can change docker-files and remove components which they do not want.
Comment · 8 years ago
Currently, it does not allow full spidering.
Comment · 8 years ago
Reminiscence has some advance features like auto-tagging, auto-summarization and archiving in various formats, which separates it from other bookmark managers. Few days back, I posted it on r/selfhosted and there one fellow redditor suggested to contact Floccus dev, instead to writing bookmark addon for every browser. Hopefully, I'll get in touch with the Floccus dev and will see if it can support Reminiscence in some form or other.