jwarden
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
> This page shows stories whose rank on the Hacker News front page is significantly lower than their raw rank, indicating that they have been penalized by Hacker News moderators.
But flags, the anti-flamewar algorithm, and other automatic adjustments that aren't moderator actions may definitely be contributing.
Invokes several ideas: the Keynesian beauty contests and self-resolving prediction markets, and the Bayesian truth serum.
As a recommender system, I like the idea of a system where you gain some sort of credit (points, reputation, etc.) for upvoting something that eventually becomes popular before it becomes popular.
I see a huge variety of topics and languages. I think one problem is that most markets are going to have very little participation. Maybe starting with a filtered selection of already popular or trending-popular videos.
EDIT: with the exception of doing IO on a freshly allocated, in-memory buffer that doesn't escape the function call.
https://jonathanwarden.com/implicit-currying-and-folded-appl...
I think sometimes people are so certain about their beliefs that they perceive any argument that challenges them to be evil, bad faith trickery. But I think the best way to respond to these arguments is simply to give compelling reasons why they are wrong (and not why the person giving them is bad).
Otherwise, some people will be mislead by these bad arguments and you will have done nothing to help but say “don’t listen to him he’s evil”, which is not very convincing really.
Promoting truth and opposing lies are the same thing.