justinlilly

As someone who does a bunch of CI/CD work, the answer is: supply chain and the security therein is a major focus of enterprises right now. Security folks as well as ops folks are keen on this. Big question is can those two groups convince the developers that this is a good idea (though vice versa should be fairly easy at a certain company size).

One of the key FAQs missing is: Is it ready? Should I use it? What should I expect my experience to be?

It's a mix of personal interest and seeking to develop an expertise. It's also a lot of discipline. I wrote more publicly in the early part of my career, but my writing is more company-internal these days.

The linux (ubuntu?) version of `open .` is `xdg-open .`

Any specific devices? Or just generally the brands of oculus & microsoft?

I think he means he's the tech equivalent. As in, "he was near many historical events, but not the focus or beneficiary of them"

I use lsp. It's not as good as pycharm, et al, but it's good.

Admissibility in court feels like the barest minimum of requirements here, to say nothing of the other services like counceling the linked thread discusses.

For the arrow coming from github to the cdn, I would bet that's a deployment where the existing docs site gets deployed as a lambda. From there, CDN calls that aren't cached go to the lambda which are then served up.

barnacl.es is HN for bootstrappers, iirc.

I work at Amazon. We've tried digital on my team. It's way worse. People make more nitpicky changes and the inline-edits/auto-suggest thing makes it easy to rat-hole. Stick to paper, imo.