jskherman
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
I would even say that "crossing out lines you disagree with" is vandalism because a book can always be read by others and come to a different conclusion and debate in their mind from there.
Why treat books as disposable mind scaffolds when they can be used again by others productively and even preserved for later generations? If you found a book to be at least somewhat useful to write notes on, then why would others not also find it useful?
Margin notes are fine though as long as they do not make the main contents of the book unreadable like "crossing out lines".
It feels like Sci-Fi novels coming true.
A natural question to ask is, if in the near future, can Google One "Google AI Pro" subscribers have higher limits than what is offered for free users?
The tweaks they found in the article is basically a proto-version of the Bullet Journal but just with its index system.
Physical notebooks are nice but as I have to come to know throughout the years, they are also kind of "disposable" and cannot survive long-term if you have to do any amount of moving. You wish you could keep all of your journals/notebooks in an archive but seems infeasible when you don't have your own house or your house is just too small. The rising rent and house prices just makes this all the worse.
Socials: - jskherman.com - github.com/jskherman - linkedin.com/in/jskherman - t.me/jskherman - jskherman.at.hn
Interests: Data Science, Technology, Books, Programming