jsiegz

Joined 14 years ago

Karma
49
Submissions
16
Member since
May 6
CEO @ Atma Sciences https://atma.inc

Apps to make apps!

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 1 year ago
Yes, and if you read the EO, Section 3(c) states:

"This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person."

In practical terms, this means:

1. Private parties (like TikTok or its users) cannot sue to enforce this EO

2. If the government doesn't follow the EO, you can't take them to court over it

3. Companies can't use this EO as a legal defense if they're sued

For example, if app stores keep hosting TikTok and get sued, they can't point to this EO as legal protection

This is important because while the EO tells app stores and other companies they won't be prosecuted, this disclaimer means they can't legally rely on that promise. If the EO is later found invalid or a new administration changes course, they could still face liability for actions taken during this period.

This creates a risky situation for companies trying to decide whether to comply with the law or follow the EO's guidance. A $5,000 fine per user of a 170M user platform means financial ruin for even Google and Apple if enforced. Larry Ellison (Oracle) might be willing to take that risk, and as a controlling founder he can do so without risk of being fired, but I don't think Tim Cook or Sundar Pichai are going to stick out their neck on this one.

Comment · 1 year ago
That only applies if it happened before January 19th. That's why his 75 day EO just says they won't go after companies who violate the law, rather than say he's using the 90 day extension provided in the law (because it's too late to use that).

Some of the media isn't picking up on this nuance, but it's clear that's why it's a 75 day lack of enforcement, not a 90 day extension.

Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 9 years ago
Bribes are generally illegal. This should be "compensates," not "bribes." "Bribes" is just hyperbole. This is standard practice for a lot of businesses in a similar space.
Comment · 10 years ago
yep i did.
Comment · 10 years ago
Looker scales with plenty of data for us at Snapchat, it's more about the underlying database than the BI tool.
Comment · 12 years ago
Comment · 13 years ago
SnowPlow is the best.

SnowPlow + Looker is a really powerful and flexible combination. [Disclaimer: I work at Looker.]

Comment · 13 years ago
A data ETL tool. Now that lots of companies are moving to MPP databases like Vertica, Redshift, Teradata, and Netezza, it's incredible that there is still no straighforward way to do so without extensive systems and data engineering experience.

Every time a customer asks us to recommend a tool to do this, we are baffled that nobody has taken this on yet (and wonder if we should do it ourselves).

The opportunity to build the Stripe for ETL is only going to get bigger.

Comment · 13 years ago
Most major daily e-mail sites do this, they just don't always send an additional e-mail to let the customer know that they do it.

Basically, it's best practice to auto-unsubscribe users who never open their e-mails to reduce risk of being marked as spam after a while.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton