jpwagner

Think of the marshmallow test as a short story by a famous author. It rings with truth, but it's not "science".

Plagiarism will undergo a change in definition.

Your observation, while accurate, is a tangent. The point of the bibliography in the context of an academic paper is to reference the academic merit of the work. In the case of science, this would be reproducible experiments (ideally).

Perhaps you would prefer to include the generated text source as an author.

if it's not reproducible, it's not science

At some point the bibliography needs to reference the LLM itself which would need to be hosted indefinitely.

^ nailed it

A long time ago I did high school math instruction. I used Sudoku for an initial introduction to proofs - something where the student knew they were implicitly going through a "proof" process.

Ran a consultancy for years

Most important advice I'd give is to liberally turn projects down and there are two positive outcomes

- you don't take on projects that don't make sense for you

- the best projects are the ones where the client is resilient enough to negotiate through your initial "no"

This is terrible fun, or dare i say "shitty-witty"