jonsuh
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
However, still no excuse. Which is why I also included the source, which is designed to be modular so you don’t have to include the whole library. The CSS is compiled via Sass and each type is its own partial that can simply be commented out. When compiled with only one of the larger types, that trims the CSS down to 1KB.
I also purposely have each type commented in the expanded CSS hamburgers.css so one can easily scan and delete the type(s) they don’t need.
Shouldn't have been considered inactive.
> "Her account has been private for a long time. Only posts a few photos of our kids… BUT she often likes and comments and stays connected on her phone with it. In my opinion that’s not really inactive."
https://twitter.com/behoff/status/456501740385226752 https://twitter.com/behoff/status/456501841308569601
It's weird that they didn't just delete the account. Instead they renamed the account to "_____kathleen": https://twitter.com/kathleenw/status/448151516399276033
> "We encourage people to actively log in and use Instagram once they create an account. To keep your account active, be sure to log in and share photos, as well as like and comment on photos. Accounts may be permanently removed due to prolonged inactivity, so please use your account once you sign up!"
Source: https://www.facebook.com/help/instagram/294919817276863
The wording is terribly obtuse and seems targeted more for username squatters.
Would be helpful if Instagram defined what a period of prolonged inactivity is. Shady nonetheless, considering they didn't even notify her informing her that her username was revoked due to inactivity.
Husband, father, Christian. Designer & developer. I live to eat. I can't sleep with socks.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jonsuh; my proof: https://keybase.io/jonsuh/sigs/NIOQrJ2K1ipO4IJpqWjI9fTU0iuvp4AimFnfbOog5tM ]