Recent submissions

Comment · 19 days ago
The reality is that it's both. LLMs (along with every tool from a hammer to GPS) shape the world instrumentally (that is, by being wielded by the user), but also turn around and shape us formally. Every tool goes into the ecology of media, reshaping reality around us, including our abilities, senses, and values.

Rich's definition of "tool" is something like Ivan Illich's "Tools for Conviviality." Convivial tools can be used with minimal loss of agency, within a healthy politically-defined society. Huahai's definition is more akin to McLuhan's idea of "media." This category covers pretty much every technical or technological system, and its use is necessarily systematic and risks the instrumentalization of the user himself.

Comment · 1 month ago
Comment · 1 month ago
This is why I like jev so much. It re-frames machines as machines, not as empathetic perfect-friend-or-soulmate-or-counselors, which they can never be, because there is no "other" to interact with. LLMs perfectly embody Kant's epistemological crisis.
Comment · 1 month ago
I miss posts like this
Comment · 1 month ago
Forgejo is a fork of gitea.
Comment · 2 months ago
Comment · 2 months ago
I like it from trying it quickly, but is there any way to use it with a provider other than vercel?
Comment · 2 months ago
This is so funny to read. I ended up creating a /cleanup-prose skill I run after every command
Comment · 2 months ago
Comment · 3 months ago
Comment · 3 months ago
These people are an opportunity for the rest of us to be better people, to show compassion and mercy. They are not worthless to the rest of society. Giving them LLM companions says that they are — that their only self-worth is their feelings.
Comment · 3 months ago
The thing is, individual moderation isn't sufficient to combat collective capture. This is Ivan Illich's idea of "radical monopoly", where a technology (like cars or the internet) becomes so entrenched that individuals can't realistically opt out any longer. This happens when we abdicate our collective responsibility to the internal logic and incentives of the tech.
Comment · 3 months ago
Yes, but design nudges use in one direction or another. Or, as McLuhan said, "the medium is the message."
Comment · 3 months ago
I don't know the answer. But a robotic voice is probably not a bad idea — just having a reminder that the thing you're talking to is not actually anything like you. If you want to go full send, you could have the LLM generate a clickable interface on demand so you could interact with it as a machine. Voice/computer interfaces are obviously useful, especially for disabled folks. But the ones that existed in the past didn't pretend to laugh at your non jokes or imitate vocal fry.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton