jokabrink
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
> [...] lowered the useful life of such bulbs, which raised their efficiency [...]
to
> [...] lowered the useful life of such bulbs, which falsely claimed to raise their efficiency [...]
emphasis mine. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phoebus_cartel&di...
Three quotes from the document:
- "Owning the Ecosystem: Letting Open Source Work for Us"
- "Google should establish itself a leader in the open source community, taking the lead by cooperating with, rather than ignoring, the broader conversation."
- "Open source alternatives can and will eventually eclipse them [OpenAI] unless they change their stance. In this respect, at least, we can make the first move."
EDIT: Misread "open to use" as "open source" and figured it was behind a signup. Sorry, my fault + maybe wishful thinking.
"Please note: because of recently-instituted tax collection requirements, we are no longer shipping to the EU or UK—sorry!"
- [1](https://www.stroustrup.com/P0977-remember-the-vasa.pdf)
Is this really true? Or just when using Red Hat systems? I don't know too much about the boot chain, but I always thought that after the ROM stage, usually GRUB would take over directly from the UEFI.
When you say: "Look, the people from village A north are stealing apples from the city orchard. Here is a list of apple thieves and the direction (N,E,S,W) from which they came." And this list shows that it appears to be majorly the directions E,S,W (so not directly from village A). Then how is this an argument?
It just shows that everybody steals apples, making the accusation "villagers of A are to blame" superficial. That's the point it tried to make.
> But there are also other reasons your conclusion is wrong I think
I would be interested on why my conclusion is wrong. At best, one could draw nothing from the data as it does not show any relation to state actors. And if this conclusion is drawn, then why did `mike_d` blame the western state actors in the first place?
Think for a second about this: Did you think that the link `mike_d` provided supported the argument "... feed the data to western governments" with the emphasis on 'western'?
If other people (and arguably other govt's) are scanning too, then saying 'west scans internet' seems somewhat superficial. Not that I deny western state actors scanning the internet, its just that everybody does it.
It is ironic that the very link [1] you provided proves you wrong. The top 5 countries of origin doing IP scanning in the last seven days are China (120k), India (67k), US (52), Iran (44k), and Russia (27k).
Technically, JPEG XL may be a superior contestant. But from a 'social' point of view? Disastrous, especially considering it already has "JPEG" in it. (To be fair, its also quite young...)
I really hope JPEG XL gets more traction because it seems like a really good successor to the old namesake.
Some insights:
- The peak DC voltage seems to be around 1.15 kV.
- The time constant is around 440 s. If you were to assume a simple RC-circuit with a constant voltage source (which it probably isnt), you would end at around 100 Ohm for the resistor.
- The start of the charging curve is not at the same time as in the video indicating that some voltage was already present from experiments before the video
Also, I am pretty sure it is not inductive coupling but capacitive because of several reasons:
- It doesn't look like a coax cable but more like an ordinary thick wire.
- I am pretty sure he didn't ground the cable at the far end and thus did not create a loop necessary for induction. And if he were, inductive coupling with ground in between would result in a very large voltage drop - If it were inductive: A single loop covering that little area would need way more turns than just one.