johnsonjo

I think YouTube just defaults to a lower resolution (was like 360p in auto when I opened it) maybe because it's mostly text (cause I noticed that too), but you can change it to be 1080p on the settings cog on the video.

Though I somewhat think some benchmarks are silly like the article says. I saw someone on YouTube recently take a picture of a building across the street from them (seemed like it was in NYC), and asked GPT 6 Astra to make it in blender. It did a surprisingly good job in 30 minutes. So though these benchmarks don't seem to mean much you could always add a touch of randomness to them like the person in the YouTube video did, but the problem with that is how would you compare the benchmarks in any clear way if they aren't even consistent? Regardless it appears LLMs are getting this good at the general task and not just at the particular instances of said task.

> only thing I'm missing is a jump to next root comment

That's a two step process currently when you are just going through the comments you click "root" on any sub-root-comment and then "next" on the root comment. Next will always take you to the next sibling comment (called a sibling, because it's a tree data-structure basically and sibling comes from a family tree. In fact where I said sub-root-comment I could have said descendants or children.)

EDIT: I just realized that the first child of the root doesn't have the "root" button so you have to click "parent" on it and then "next".

> Yeah i understand that but it is logically right to reply with "Tom Cruise" or any of the girls to that question because by its structure it requires only 1 of the 4 answers since it asks for a singular child right?

Yes that is correct it is logically correct to reply Tom Cruise or any of the girls, and that was their point that there are four possible answers to one question.

> Why would it have several answer when you are asking for a singular child?

By the way this quote was the focus of my GP comment since I didn't quote it there.

> Or is it like we are saying while that is logically correct, its not the actual answer and the model should reply "they have more than one child, here is the list of children" and that would be a more accurate one even though the prompt strictly asked for just 1 child?

This was not his point so I feel like we are moving the goal posts a bit, so no though that could have been what's said I don't think that's what was really being said.

> Might have several. It only has one answer if there is only one child, which appears to be the case here.

With context. It does have several which was probably GPs point, and she did not have only one child.

Quick google search turns out that Mary Lee Pfeiffer had 4 children:

Lee Ann DeVette (born 1959) (daughter) Marian Henry (born 1960) (daughter) Tom Cruise (born 1962) (son) Cass Mapother (born 1964) (daughter)

So saying "Who is Mary Lee Pfeiffer's child?" would have 4 possible answers (which is several) with all known context. Whereas like GP was saying "Who is Mary Lee Pfeiffer's son?" would have 1 identifying answer, Tom Cruise with the same context.

> In this case, the correct would always include “Tom Cruise” even if it needed a clarifying “there might be others I have no knowledge of”.

I agree with this by the way.

The space of possible answers is more than one is all GP is saying. Mary Lee Pfeiffer had 1 son, Tom Cruise, and 3 daughters. That's why saying Who is Mary Lee Pfeiffer's son was an identity, because it strictly identifies (or singles out) Mary's son, Tom.

Kind of a weird way to draw an analogy, but in math it's kind of like |x|=2 (the absolute value of x is 2) the answer for the value of x is -2 and 2 sure you could reply that the answer is 2 and be correct (even though you would still be missing something, because the space of possible answers includes both 2 and -2). To relay that back to Mary Lee Pfeiffer saying she has Tom Cruise as a child is correct, but the actual answer could include any 4 of her children (including Tom or one of the 3 daughters) and still be correct.

My sister went to an allergist and found out she is allergic to corn/HFCS as well with similar symptoms as you (hives, vomit inducing). Corn and HFCS are in almost literally everything, so it's a really hard allergy for her to have. You say now you eat it for breakfast? What do you mean by that? Are you over your allergy and what has worked for you if so? If you could give someone going through something similar advice what would you say?