johnmlussier

If you are expecting any sort of usable limits on their subscription plan I suggest adjusting your expectations. I subscribed to $99 a month plan and within 47 minutes with one session (not asking for swarms or anything) was limited by 5-hour quota.

Paying $200 a month and part of their Cyber Verification Program but can't use Opus 5.5 or Sonnet 5.5 for any authorized bounty work. Immediately get flagged for `Cyber`.

This is bollocks. Their safeguards are shit.

I am increasingly hesitant to use non-native harnesses - model providers are now starting to train their agents for use within the harness. An eval like terminal bench can only capture so much data. I don't want to have to assess each harness every model release to make sure it's working as well as it can.

They killed cyber capabilities so I have to move over to Daybreak on Codex.

No smart phones for kids under 16. Problem solved.

@boris and anthropic in general are incredibly hostile to the rest of the development world. They think their shit doesn’t stink.

Been running it using Prime Agent and absolutely love it.

I really liked the contributor model in their harness. I suspect that another harness would fail hard like you're seeing.

Pointing out for others: without warning I was restricted from using the contributor model because of “policy violations”. I was working on Kaggle research and some Apple Security work at the time. They really need to make cyber a first priority product feature.

`model failed: API error 403 [request_id=27ef1dee-6366-4779-9057-ed7c27686fa9]: Your access has been restricted due to repeated policy violations. (permission_error)`

I've switched over to Codex. On Extra High reasoning it seems very capable and is definitely catching mistakes Sonnet has missed. I'd love to move back to Opus but at this time it is untenable.

I am absolutely moving off them if this continues to be the case.

This was Opus saying that after reviewing the [REDACTED] bug bounty program guidelines and having them in context.

Incredible - in one fell swoop killing my entire use case for Claude.

I have about 15 submissions that I now need to work with Codex on cause this "smarter" model refuses to read program guidelines and take them seriously.