Recent submissions

Comment · 3 months ago
Hi HN, I built openmog. The AI here has not views of its own. It answers questions using only what people post/comment; and the truth is graded by the responses/voting of the posts.
Comment · 5 months ago
I have no idea why I'm coming up as showdead. Thanks for letting me know. I just sent an email to HN.

On the embed image idea: I understand. If there's demand for that I'd most definitely implement that. For now, landing on the Piece page has all the available information for the current funding status of the Piece and whatnot.

Good idea

Comment · 5 months ago
A "GitHub for inventions" sounds like a project worth building. I wonder if you could pre-fill the site in with public patents and show the diffs of each patent; that would be interesting to me. Good luck with that and the DIY projects!

You hit the nail on the head regarding the "AI slop" worry. I think the majority of it will be AI agents in the future and/or heavily assisted with AI. To filter out that noise, Pieces tracks a creator's lifetime volume and uses a weighted rating system where only actual participants in a Piece can affect the rating. That should help a little, but still needs to be proven in practice.

The "pipeline of ideas" concept is interesting. I'll definitely reach out to some DJs and see if this would interest them.

Really appreciate the ideas and the brainstorm!

Comment · 5 months ago
Thanks for the thoughtful comparison and the links!

You actually inspired me to make a quick change. Based on your note about photos and media, I just ungated the platform. I previously had a text Pieces only flag active, but I've turned it off. You can now attach images, video, audio, and docs to a Piece; not just text.

As for your other points:

Time-limits for release: This is a super interesting idea. If people find it useful, I think it could fit into Pieces.

Tipping vs. Funding: The investigative journalist or artist scenario is exactly the shape that Pieces is built for ("fund the unlock"). While voluntary post-release tips are great, they don't fully solve the free-rider problem that Pieces aims to address via dominant assurance contracts. Platforms like BuyMeACoffee handle tips well, but Pieces is laser-focused on the pre-release funding stage.

Good luck with your projects as well! What are you currently working on?

Comment · 5 months ago
Hi HN, I built Pieces.

Many people never make a cent from what they know, even though information clearly has value. The problem is that information is infinitely copyable. The moment you share something good, the window to get paid closes and the downstream value flows to everyone but you.

Pieces is built on a dominant assurance contract (DAC), a two-sided mechanism:

1. Backers pool funds to unlock a piece of information they want.

2. If the goal is met, it unlocks and the creator gets paid.

3. If it isn't, backers are refunded plus a premium, just for pledging.

So backing has no downside: you either get the information you paid for, or you get paid for your attention. A piece can be anything, from independent research to a hot take.

Posting is free and takes seconds. Happy to answer questions about the whole flow.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton