jmoak3
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/10/12/23andme...
[1] https://customercare.23andme.com/hc/en-us/articles/212170688...
It's relatively expensive and a little janky but it's insane how much more time I feel I have in my day. My work has improved (if my commit-calendars are any indication), and I no longer spend time in bed scrolling when I sleep / wake up.
Many people try "Sober October" - I've just completed "Dumbphone December" and I don't think I'll be going back.
In more words: young people will crowd into cities in order to meet other young people and find work, while aged areas descend into irrelevance and whatever this is: [1]
Due to this, Greater Tokyo now contains 1/3rd the population of Japan[2]. While you can find a number of articles claiming it's cheap compared to metros in other countries, or horrifically expensive[3][4], whichever it may be it is certainly better than what's in [1].
[1] https://unusualplaces.org/nagoro-a-creepy-japanese-village-w...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Tokyo_Area
[3] https://www.reuters.com/markets/asia/surging-tokyo-property-...
[4] https://www.businessinsider.com/america-build-like-tokyo-hou...
With measured change in C02 the past 60 years[0], how can we expect the system to behave the same? In my lifetime I will breathe air with C02 levels of 480ppm. Throw in the high sea temperatures [1][2] if you would like some bonus content.
Idk what it means for us on the ground. 90% of the doomerisms haven't gone anywhere - but this is worth keeping an eye on. Who knows, maybe in 3 more generations we'll hit 800ppm C02 and experience cognitive decline[3] before we have to worry about the climate system getting funky :)
[0] https://www.climate.gov/media/15554
[1] https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily
[2] https://climate.copernicus.eu/sites/default/files/custom-upl...
[3] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016041201...
I don't know if I'll stick with the change, but so far I'm having fun with the experience.
The Israel/Gaza war is a large factor - I don't know what to believe when I read about it online. I can be more slow and careful about what I read and consume from my desktop, from trusted sources. I'm insulated from viral images sent hastily to me via social media, from thumbnails of twitter threads of people with no care if they're right or wrong, from texts containing links with juicy headlines that I have no hope of critically examining while briefly checking my phone in traffic.
This is all infinitely worse in a world where content can be generated by multi-modal LLMs.
I have no way to know if any of the horrific images/videos I've already seen thru the outlets I've identified were real or AI generated. I'll never know, but it's too important to leave to chance. For that reason I'm trying something new to set myself up for success. I'm still informed, but my information intake is deliberately slowed. I think that others may follow in time, in various ways.
Here's a link to the relevant historical record: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25GjijODWoI&t=93s
I don't think existing media channels will continue to be an effective way to disseminate information. The noise destroys the usefulness of it. I think people will stop coming to platforms for news and entertainment as they begin to distrust them.
The surveillance prospect however, is frightening.
I think rulings against these companies are warranted, but I want an end game where iPhone is closer to Android's best aspects, not where Android drops them to mimic iPhone's. Google could easily stop being as "anti-competitive" by not releasing another public update of Android again, launching a new "Pixel Play Store" available on Pixel, and putting all of their effort into this platform going forward. The world would be a worse place for this, and Google would likely make more services revenue. I have a feeling developers would abandon the other manufacturer's platforms in a microsecond. If Google's not allowed to have influence over the default search/apps installed on 3rd party android phones made by Samsung/HTC, why would Google even bother with the business? They only ran it to get more mobile search users into Google Search IMO.
I'm sure Google deserves to get smacked for the worst of their behavior but Apple walking away (for now) without a scratch is sending a stark message, at least to my eyes. You say Apple's time with this behavior is limited, and I can only hope you're right. Being positive, hopefully down the line, this case can be used as a wedge to peel Apple's grip open.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37731541#37732596
I don't want to be pithy and low-effort here. I'm confused on why Google lost while Apple won.
Toyota has been good to the area.
Off topic, but is there a popular tech meetup in the state? Moved back a year and some change ago and would love to get more involved.