jmau111
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
I tried to summarize what I've learned so far, but, of course, it's neither exhaustive nor suited for targeted attacks.
Indeed, I was not thinking about that level of attacks. However, if individuals and organizations do not understand the minimum required to secure their instances, they can't stand a chance against advanced threat actors and skilled adversaries.
Thanks for your detailed explanations.
It's just that privesc and kernel exploits is possible under some conditions on Linux.
It seems that browsers and extensions handle a huge part of the global security for users, maybe even more than the OSes.
I've seen so many people relying on the OS and thinking themselves as power users just by using it with default settings. I think it's a mistake, hence my comparison.
Attacking a secured Windows system is not at everybody's reach. Doesn't mean it can't be done, but it's something I don't like to read in security news, like finding and exploiting 0days will be easy for attackers.
It's not and can take some time. There's even a huge market for initial access. In contrast, exploiting a vulnerable Linux system (e.g., unpatched) is documented everywhere.