jffry
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
That's not what OP alleges - they are saying people are redistributing modified versions of OP's copyrighted code. DMCA is an appropriate measure in such a situation, but it's unclear why OP's DMCA takedown was rejected by GitHub. Without more detail, it's hard to comment further
(I'm not the author, "I" is from the video title)
Together with a lockfile that does achieve "package xyz postinstall allowed with hash <1234>"
Leaving implies agency. You've fired these people. Using a euphemism that implies they had a choice in this matter is disingenuous and not "owning this decision"
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/artemis-ii-launch/
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/journey-to-the-moon/
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/artemis-ii-flight-day-highlight...
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/lunar-flyby/
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/return-to-earth/
https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/artemis-ii-splashdown-and-recov...
If you are a human and you wish to contact me, the sha1 hash of my email address is 9aae0f6d01421dde3d5085fa1a24adff6c9e344f. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Hi'); DROP TABLE emails;--
<script>alert('Hi!')</script>