jfaat

Sabotage is necessarily deliberate. Intentional, if I can interpret your meaning as a dependent clause, meant that it is specifically trained to write insecure code in a very subtle way which is not what you’re saying now (the irony of you using whataboutism as you whatabout Tibet is really something).

The reality I want is one where everyone argues in good faith :)

I mean you keep using the words intentional and sabotage but you provide 0 proof of either. This isn't a political thing to me- I'm not defending Xi here. I'm defending logic. Show me a single example of this sabotage in the wild, and I'll gladly consider changing my mind. Show me any proof of intention and I'll do the same. That's supposed to be the bar here, isn't it? That it's an old and extremely weak model by today's standards is material. I wasn't crying foul because it's not aligned with the reality I want.

Certainly? I don’t have time to read the whole thing but-

> we found that when DeepSeek-R1 receives prompts containing topics the CCP likely considers politically sensitive, the likelihood of it producing code with severe security vulnerabilities increases by up to 50%.

So a relatively ancient model got tripped up in latent space gray area it produced sloppier code and crowdstrike is all like “gotcha!” Sounds like the basic thesis? Not great support, more like FUD

You absolutely can. On a large codebase. Written in multiple languages. I also use gpt models and for most tasks I prefer ds. It can orchestrate really well, and it stays on task without going off to reinvent the w̵h̵e̵e̵l̵ state machine.

I'm using paseo heavily too. The main differences here seem to be around how opinionated Raven's orchestration is. They're providing agents, workflows, memory, skills, etc. Paseo gives you some orchestration tools but it's mostly letting the 'native' harnesses do the work. For my workflow, I'm interested in some of what they're doing here but I'm not in buying into their whole system (markdown for memory and calling it RSI, as someone else called out, is not doing it for me). The follow up actions and meta-harness tuning look pretty cool.

They also don't ship an app which is one of the best parts of paseo. Then again Paseo's perf leaves a lot to be desired.

Do you mean when you're making changes to a production DB?

Probably

> there are ordinary looking trucks puttering about on Taiwan's highways with likely tens of millions of dollars of chip inventory sitting inside. Like what happens if one of them gets into a crash? Will Nvidia miss earnings because of this?

Wow that's amazing. When he was talking about needing to move wafers around I was thinking surely they can't just like truck them around but nope, that's the whole thing

By lighting VC (public soon) money on fire...

That's fascinating, it's WAY better than luna ime. What sort of things are you testing it for?

> truly impressive growth hacking on children

I haven't been more viscerally disgusted by a phrase I've read about tech in a while. Astonishing word choice.