jesenator
Joined 1 year ago
Karma
44
Submissions
11
Member since
Dec 16
Joined 1 year ago
Maybe better examples are helping with health advice, where to donate, finding recipes, or examples of policymakers using AI to make strategic decisions.
These are, although maybe not on their face, value laden questions, and often don't have well defined objective criteria for their answers (as another comment says).
Let me know if this addresses your comment!
So these things all affect its response, especially for questions that ask for randomness or are not strongly held values.
Agreed on RLHF dominating the results here, which I'd argue is a good thing, compared to the alternative of them mimicking training data on these questions. But obviously not perfect, as the demo tries to show.
It is, in a way, technically true that LLMs are stochastic parrots, but this undersells their capabilities (winning gold on the international math olympiad, and all that).
It's like saying that human brains are "just a pile of neurons", which is technically true, but not useful for conveying the impressive general intelligence and power of the human brain.