jeroen

And you can switch out the original trackpad for a glass one, which is much nicer.

> Disney+ provides some plans for watching movies and series without commercial interruption – Disney+ Standard and Disney+ Premium. However, those tiers may include ... ads/promos before or after playback of content ...

This implies that "Disney+ Standard With Ads" DOES have ad breaks. The other plans could force you to watch ads before your movie starts.

If we actually (as the title seems to imply) invert the parentheses, then for your example we get 1+2)*(3 .

Now all you need are the opening and closing parentheses at the start and end, and we're back to normal.

Episerver bought Optimizely and then took the name.

I think you mean Aldi Nord and Aldi Sud, _reportedly_ split over a dispute about selling cigarettes. Lidl is not related.

I'm more surprised when I encounter one that isn't hostile like this.

They don't even get basic details right. The ship in the 8th video changes with every camera change and birds appear out of nowhere.

selection?

As Spolsky said a long time ago:

> It’s harder to read code than to write it.

When it shows you a hunk that's bigger than you like, you can use 's' to split it into smaller hunks.

> Files in Git can be in one of these three states: Modified, Staged, Committed

> Staged: The current version of the modified file is staged to be included in the next commit.

A bit of a nitpick, but if I change a file, "git add" it, and then change it again, both of these statements are false.

I would start by defining an MVP. What do you really need to support operations, and what can wait until later? If it can be done by hand for a while, don't put it in the MVP. If you can manage with Excel for a few months, don't put it in the MVP. That should give you insight into how big of a project you are looking at. The bigger the project, the greater the chance it's not going to go well.

EDIFACT is a bit of a mess, but not that scary. IME the details of logistics are more complex.

If you are in Europe there are a lot of people in software development in non-glamorous industries. I see more risk in judging tech talent. How do you know if you're talking to the right people?

Something seems to be off with the grouping. If you look at Chinon (France) there are 2 different statuses, but 3 groups. A1 is not grouped with A2 and A3.