jcr
Joined 18 years ago
Joined 18 years ago
Some truly great stories get few, if any, comments. If a post requires effort or specialized knowledge to even ask good questions, then there isn't much discussion. This happens a lot when academic papers are posted since reading a paper might require a multi-hour investment, but even when there is little discussion, it's good to have heavy articles submitted. They balance out the other stuff.
If you find something great-but-overlooked in the /newest queue, then send an email to [email protected] asking for a repost request to be sent to the original submitter. That's what I did with this article, but Dan (dang) asked me to repost it myself. Neither 'ingve' nor I care who gets the credit/karma, but a lot of people want great articles to get attention on HN.
HN is what we make it.
- "Systematic Abstraction of Abstract Machines" from JFP 2012 (39 pages)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.3539
- "Abstracting Abstract Machines" from ACM ICFP, 2010, (12 pages)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.4446
http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/fall2014/cmsc631/papers/vanhorn-...
- "Abstracting Abstract Machines" from CACM highlight 2011 (8 pages)
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/dvanhorn/pubs/vanhorn-might-cacm...
( 426 points Stratoscope a day ago 97 comments )
( 263 points taspeotis a day ago 93 comments )
(557 points by yk 9 hours ago | flag | 165 comments)
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/renewables/google...
"I think figuring out how technology can encourage empathy is one of the more interesting and important open research problems in the world right now." -- Sam Altman, July 10 2015 [1]
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3cudmx/i_am_sam_altman_reddit_board_member_and_president/csz2vis