jc123
Joined 16 years ago
Karma
1,621
Submissions
239
Member since
Aug 31
Recent submissions
Comment · 9 years ago
Comment · 9 years ago
Nit: recipient is the correct spelling for the book. Will keep eye on this.
Comment · 10 years ago
There's a stackexchange with technical answers to most of these questions, such as:
http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/191/how-can-i-se...
For #3, an introduction is:
https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/12/24/understanding-serenity-...
and the improvement proposal is: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/28
For #1, there are checksums now, but the more interesting question and challenge is how would a decentralized registry/DNS be designed, that has reasonable anti-incentives for squatters?
Comment · 10 years ago
If you want a challenge and can contribute, some details are:
EIP 105 (Serenity): Binary sharding plus contract calling semantics
https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/53
Very technical open discussion here:
https://gitter.im/ethereum/research
I believe they also have weekly Google Hangout on Mondays.
Comment · 10 years ago
Perhaps Github Issues itself should be available as a mechanism for people to provide feedback about Github itself.
Comment · 11 years ago
Both editions of the book were before the invention of blockchains. Integrating it in the next edition of the book would be solid work: not just explaining a blockchain but really integrating it with existing parts of computer science.
Comment · 11 years ago
Why? Interested in your reasons. One plausible one is that trusting an author you know can be more practical than examining every line of a massive open source code base. Could that be a reason? Others?
Comment · 11 years ago
Very nice short video Nash did for the Abel prize http://www.abelprisen.no/artikkel/vis.html?tid=63683
Comment · 11 years ago
With crashes, though rare in Chrome, when one does happen it usually kills all my Chrome windows instead of a single tab as is touted :/
Comment · 11 years ago
It's not clear what parts the author modified last month, since the bulk of the article is from the past. A separate, additional article would be interesting to hear author's recent views and experiences.
For something upcoming, http://www.augur.net is an attempt at a decentralized prediction market.
Comment · 11 years ago
Nothing to be sorry about; you made me look up 'dublicate' because it would be good to know if it was a real word. We're about sharing knowledge here.
Comment · 11 years ago
Note: since you wrote it twice incorrectly, the word is spelled 'duplicate'. 'Dublicate' could be an interesting word since it resembles double, but it doesn't exist yet.
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com
https://ethereum.stackexchange.com