Recent submissions

Comment · 1 year ago
An alternative is using an eSIM with an “internet breakout” via another country.

Esimdb is a good place to start.

Comment · 1 year ago
He could’ve skipped the intermediate steps and made it a one-liner by piping the sql dump over ssh right into the sqlite3 reconstruction command.
Comment · 3 years ago
Depends what you mean by “holding” USD. Is it under your mattress? Or in a bank? Is it a bank in Venezuela or Lebanon?

Holding USDT is kind of holding USD. You just have Tether in the middle.

Main utility (value?) of stablecoins is to “bridge” USD fiat into crypto though.

Interestingly, crypto.com (exchange) keeps a “USD” balance for its customers, which is separate from its USDT balance. You can deposit/withdraw to/from your “USD” balance via fiat (bank transfer) or a basket of stablecoins like USDC, BUSD etc. Binance does this as well, and FTX before. They all kept USDT separate though. Worth considering why this is the case.

Comment · 3 years ago
If Tether is insolvent then better to ban it earlier than later, before it becomes even “too bigger” to fail.
Comment · 3 years ago
The other stablecoins are unaffected though…
Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Why not just use or alias ‘mv’ to trash?
Comment · 4 years ago
In the article, a Wizz Air rep explained it’s meant to charge bots and other automations for booking, but is catching users who use ad blockers as a false positive.
Comment · 4 years ago
Just send it to yourself first?
Comment · 5 years ago
This is it. Amount of energy spent = profits from mining / cost of energy.

While price is the main factor affecting profits, fees/volume and the constantly decreasing block reward also play a part.

Comment · 5 years ago
> Maybe HFT is intellectually more interesting than day-trading but I don't believe it to be very gratifying at deeper level.

HFT is automated day-trading in a way, so 1 meta level more intellectually interesting I suppose.

Comment · 6 years ago
> The Supreme Court asked them to block the delivery of content inside of Brazil, for brazilians in Brazil's territory.

If you read the article it’s saying the court is asking Facebook to block delivery of certain content globally, not only within Brazil. And they are threatening a local Facebook employee with criminal liability, which is the reason Facebook says it has complied with the order while appealing it.

Comment · 6 years ago
The Brazilian Supreme Court is asking Facebook to block accounts globally, not only in Brazil.
Comment · 6 years ago
He’s probably saying these are free apps which Apple doesn’t take any money for, and the money the developers keep are from ads or fees from clients and so on.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton