jalammar

Joined 19 years ago

Karma
708
Submissions
113
Member since
Jan 22
http://jalammar.github.io
View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
Hi HN, I created this cheat sheet and video as high-level guidance to the major categories of ML explainability research and techniques. It's an area I've been working in the last year and this is how I synthesized the lay of the land in my head based on excellent references listed in the page. I hope you find it useful. It's non-exhaustive and will be updated, so please let me know if you have any feedback for future revisions. Thanks!
Comment · 5 years ago
I wouldn't trust any model to generate text for customers yet. Not even the largest GPT3. There are no guarantees on what they will output and could be damaging to your business.

You're better off either: 1- Defining common "intents" that a lot of customer queries are categorized into, and having a model map the incoming message to the appropriate canned response. Look at Rasa, for an example of this.

2- if you insist on generating the text, have it be a recommendation to a human agent that either chooses to send it or writes their own response.

Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
I didn't come across one yet personally
Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
Hey, I feel you! I'm an intuitive learner as well. I wouldn't have been able to learn much in ML if it weren't for people who write and visualize and make the methods accessible to non-experts. In my case, as with many others, it was the writing and videos of Andrew Ng, Karpathy, Chris Olah, Nando de Freitas, Sebastian Ruder, Andrew Trask, and Denny Britz amongst others. Accessible content like this goes a long way in building the confidence to further pursue the topic and not be intimidated by the steep learning curve. It fill me with joy that you've found some of my work helpful.

Thanks for digging up the screenshot. Exploring contextualize word embeddings is truly fascinating. And thanks for sharing your experience!

Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
Interesting. Thanks for sharing your notes on the higher layers. Allow me to repost that to the discussion board on github.

I do get your point on interpretation. This work is just a starting point. I'm curious to arrive at ways to automatically select the appropriate number of factors for a specific sequence. Kind of like the elbow method for K-means clustering.

Comment · 5 years ago
These are AI explanation methods. They belong to the toolbox which would include LIME, Shapley values...etc. Input saliency is a gradient-based explanation method.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton