jakubadamw

We’ll all be like Rick Rubin or we will be no ones.

Q: You must know something. So what are you being paid for? A: The confidence that I have in my taste and my ability to express what I feel

You're right, I changed it a little.

No, I think he is right.

DHH’s blog post was, to put it simply, spot on. You disagree with that, and that’s fine.

But to cancel a subscription for another service entirely, because someone used a blog platform of the same provider to publish something you were repulsed by – this seems like a really bizarre way of managing your emotion. By this logic I should feel compelled to delete my HN account, delete all my social media and cancel all press subscriptions…

The collective leverage of a union gives you significantly more power to do something like this.

I believe the commenter above meant risk to the company, not the employee.

> Notice also that German social security institutions are filled to the brim with Eastern European claimants.

Utterly false: nationals of Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania account for approximately 4.9% of all SGB-II Leistungsberechtigte (~256,000 of 5.24 million as of December 2025).

> The Marshall plan also did not involve the US having completely free access to Germany economically and move all their companies to Germany for cheaper wages.

This is such a bizarre point. The openness of the common market goes both ways, you do realise that, right? For more than the first decade after the accession of the Central Eastern European countries to the EU, Western European countries saw an influx of workers that were well educated (or skilled in trade professions), which helped fill the gaps in their labour market. So if you were going to try to draw an analogy here, you’d also have to point out that the US didn’t import millions of Germans after the war into its own labour market. Well, barring some rocket scientists who had built weapons of mass destruction and death for Hitler.

Anyway, yes, that’s how the common market works: companies can move operations to countries where labour is cheaper (in Poland), but other companies have encouraged labour to move where they already operate (in Germany). And what’s forgotten in this discussion is that the cohesion subsidies are in fact a form of compensation for the inherent imbalance that a pure common market would exhibit. That’s why it took years in negotiations for those poorer countries to decide under what terms they’re actually willing to open up their markets, and in many cases it’s been a very controversial issue.

It’s a factor that’s not any more significant than the Marshall Plan was in your Wirtschaftswunder in the 1970s, which, oddly enough, a lot of Germans have no issue attributing to a domestic merit alone. Funny how that works!

If it was the EU contributions that were the dominant force here, Germany could… simply do the same and prop up its own struggling economy with money printed by the ECB. Instead, it prefers to see it crumble under an obese welfare state that largely funds inactive third-world fake asylum seekers. So clearly, there’s way more nuance to economic success than simply having funds redirected from one account to another.

Correct, so that’s why it needs to be employed to help develop the Western EV industries so that they can compete with that of China.

EVs are so different that the know-how of the combustion engine power automobile industry does not extend to them. In fact, it can be detrimental.