jackfischer

Is it realistic that this has been on HF for a week and it's not been taken down for copyright?

What do you make of the “eternal September” explanation of the shift away from the internet you describe? I wasn’t alive for it

Civilization is nimble and redirecting scarce resources that have alternative uses

The public very much voted for massive administrative reform. Are you refering to DOGE, Elon Musk's influence on elections, something else?

Broadly agreed. But the triangle shirtwaist factory is about as far from "my boss calls me and it's stressful" as one can get! I'm disappointed that a some activists can inflict their preference for comfort on all of us.

Ultimately companies don't exist for the employees they exist to deliver something to the customers that rely on you. Stress and uncertainty are part of work and life. Why should that come before the people you're serving?

_Some_ people _might_ want - and a very privileged something at that! This is not west virginia coal wars. Why do a handful of ideologues get to insert themselves in the employee employer relationship for something so tame?

The line of what rises to the level of "solve it with force", eg solve it with legal intervention, is understandably blurry. But in the trash example, if you indeed never agreed to it, that's already a legal issue and rightly so. This OTOH is a private aspect of the employee employer relationship and not exactly a human rights abuse like some of the pearl clutching comments here suggest FWIW writing as someone who went through and goes through very intense on call and all hours availability and firefighting for weeks on end, something I chose voluntarily. I don't want anyone interfering with my ability to choose that and accomplish what we accomplished.

Why is this a government issue at all? It was unclear from the article why some contingent that doesn't like their relationship with their employer ought to be able to inflict their solution on everyone in Michigan via politics as the mechanism instead of the market

Putting aside the diversification argument, the three combined would be about ~5-6%. Definitely noteworthy but not really earth shattering

"Weaponizes" is such odd word choice. I didn't catch anything in the article that sounded remotely nefarious.

We need more ambitious risk taking and more people "in the arena".

Is this only in ChatGPT proper and not in the API? Requests appear to 400 and it does not appear in `/v1/models`

Makes sense, appreciate it