j_shi
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
Rough math plugging in public #s and comments here:
- All stock deal at Aug 2021 val of 38B (1B ARR)
- Assume rev doubled to 2B (which may even be aggressive)
- SAAS multiples are down 6x since Aug 2021
- 38B x 2 / 6 = $12.7B
- 12.7B / 38B * 1.3B = 434M = effective price
- Assume 100M to pref stock
--> Comes out to 334M, with a chunk of that (1/3? 1/4?) potentially subject to earn out
Similar offline risk goes for all tech: navigation, generating energy, finding food & water.
And as others have noted, like other personal tools, ai will become more portable and efficient (see progress on self hosted, minimal, efficiently trained models like Vicuna that are 92% parity with OpenAI fancy model)
https://lmsys.org/blog/2023-03-30-vicuna/
https://www.semianalysis.com/p/google-we-have-no-moat-and-ne...
While consumers are happy to get their data mined to avoid paying, businesses are the opposite: willing to pay a lot to avoid feeding data to MSFT/GOOG/META.
They may give assurances on data protection (even here GitHub copilot TOS has sketchy language around saving down derived data), but can’t get around fundamental problem that their products need user interactions to work well.
So it seems with BigTechLLM there’s inherent tension between product competitiveness and data privacy, which makes them incompatible with enterprise.
Biz ideas along these lines: - Help enterprises set up, train, maintain own customized LLMs - Security, compliance, monitoring tools - Help AI startups get compliant with enterprise security - Fine tuning service
Where the valuation came down to earth was when public investors evaluated We as an incrementally better office rental company, and didn't buy the idea of We as creating and monetizing a religion.