ivoflipse

I was going to comment the same thing, rather than push off harder, I'd hope it help brace for impact and relieve some of the weaker muscles.

Yes, I should perhaps be doing strength training, but I have limited hours to exercise and I'd prefer to spend them running rather than training so that eventually I could be running.

Another thing that happens is that your technique gets worse during longer runs, making you more prone to injuries. Maybe a device like this could either support you so you can run longer runs or compensate to make sure you don't hurt yourself.

So if this device helps with reducing running based injuries, I'm all for it

I have an electric cargo bike that I put in one of the lowest settings, if I cycle at the top speed it doesn't help much if at all. But accelerating from a dead stop is nice. This could be similar

Not today, it requires wgpu-py to support running on WASM / pyodide, which it doesn't yet (unfortunately)

If you've submitted a 510k for your medical device, you can advertise it as "510k pending".

There is a risk that you never receive the clearance or approval, but in this case Apple probably knew they had already addressed any feedback the FDA had so it was very likely there would be no further stumbling blocks

Learned Optimism has a similar style of explaining the author's work over many years in an accessible manner

Did they provide you with Instructions for Use as a lay person? This might contain the legalese on what is or isn't permissible.

The company is required to have a complaint handling process, such that you making them aware of these vulnerabilities would mean they have to at least handle the feedback.

Maybe your findings can be rephrased in a way that don't require you to show how vulnerable their servers are, but that you suspect it's unsafe.