itwasntandy
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
The lice from the farmed fish devastate the wild salmon populations, so ecologically they are awful.
That to me is a pretty clear reason to avoid farmed salmon.
For example:
> A recent study in British Columbia links the spread of parasitic sea lice from river salmon farms to wild pink salmon in the same river
We have under 100 engineers at BuzzFeed, so for us we reduce time spent supporting applications by a single percentage is almost equivalent to having an extra engineer!
On a typical day we'll do 180+ deploys. That'll be roughly 60% stage, 40% production. To deploy outside of continuous deployments (e.g. to push a branch build to a stage environment), is as simple as browsing to our deploy UI, selecting the service you want to deploy, the version, and the cluster to deploy too. It takes an engineer about 40 seconds to do that (time measured from typing URL, to hitting the deploy button)
Continuous deployments means for production deploys for master, that step is automated. So that's a saving (in engineer time) of around 40 seconds per deploy. Over the last month over 1400 deploys were made via continuous deployment.
This means from a developer productivity perspective roughly 2 engineer days per month (1400 deploys * 40 secs per deploy / 3600 to get into hours / 8 hours per day) ) are being saved as a result of this change.
However this is really a side benefit. Our real motivation for making this change was to ensure that all master builds are deployed, and that each of our ~500 micro services is always on latest master.
This is to reduce developer anxiety of deploying over a branch build and thus minimize stress around making change.
The productivity side benefit is pretty nice though!
BuzzFeed | SWE, Core Infra | San Francisco | Onsite Full time | https://boards.greenhouse.io/buzzfeed/jobs/1855419?gh_jid=18...
We’re looking for engineers who understand how good tools can shape company culture, and who are passionate about creating tools and automation to develop and improve the platform that underpins BuzzFeed.
Email me - [email protected] - with any questions, or apply directly to the job specs above.
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_London_Under...
It only works if it scans _everyone_ .
Additionally what happens when the technology isn’t perfect and innocent people get mistakenly flagged as persons of interest?
The other thing is once it’s installed and in operation, what’s to stop it being used for other purposes? - being used to target people peacefully protesting against the government or whatever.
It’s a slippery path from there into a surveillance state - China is already pretty much there with their social credit system - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System
I for one don’t want to wake up someday soon and discover it’s 1984...
That illustrates fairly well why having an underclass who provides healthy organs to the rich is a utterly barbaric idea.
In Europe it’s different - https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/organic/eu-policy/eu-rules-...
“When the animals are ill, chemically synthesised allopathic veterinary medicinal products including antibiotics may be used where necessary and under strict conditions. This is only allowed when the use of phytotherapeutic, homeopathic and other products is inappropriate.”
Yes routes from Apple maps, may appear longer or more convoluted at first glance. However after using it ( due to CarPlay) for a while on routes I had previously regularly done using google maps, I inferred a reasoning for that.
On the ~90 minute journey to my in-laws, the predicted journey time, is generally advertised as being quicker on google, but in practice the time difference is marginal.
What was different in my experience anyway, is that Apple maps seems to try to minimize left turns where appropriate. The benefit being a noticeably less stressful journey.
Has anyone else noticed this?
We adjust those down - somewhere 10-15 seconds for HealthCheckIntervalSeconds and 3 for HealthyThresholdCount works pretty well.
As a recurse alum (s14 batch 2) I loved reading this. I loved my time at recurse and learned lots. This highlight from the post really resonates:
“ Real growth happens at the boundary of what you can do and what you can almost do. Used well, LLMs can help you more quickly find or even expand your edge, but they risk creating a gap between the edge of what you can produce and what you can understand.
RC is a place for rigor. You should strive to be more rigorous, not less, when using AI-powered tools to learn, though exactly what you need to be rigorous about is likely different when using them.”